British Democracy and Iraq War Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 words

British Democracy and Iraq War - Essay Example They also argued that there was need to liberate the Iraq people from the oppressive regime which was not democratic and was abusing the human rights of its citizens (Armstrong, Farrell, & Maiguashca, 2005). Democratic norms are in most cases not perceived to be relevant to the foreign and international policies of a country. However, in the consideration of the democracy framework of various governments a number of critical questions arise. The first one is about respect of the international law by a country, basing on the fact that such a government cannot easily acquire the democratic tribute in regard to the rule of law locally if it is capable of violating the rule of law in a foreign country. The international law is much vaguer compared to the domestic one, but majority of the international lawyers are in agreement that Iraq's invasion by both the United States of America and Britain was a blatant breach on the charter of the United Nations. The charter is very clear and stipulates that armed forces can only be used in a case of self defense or when the United Nations Security Council explicitly authorizes use of such force (Vickers, 2004). Tony Blair in attacking Iraq had complete disregard of the United Nation's charter in fact, his speech in 1999 whi... ve failed to implement them and hence country's like Britain and the United States of America, have to bear some burden like invading Iraq since they have a sense of world responsibility. In this case he was actually implying that his government had the right to invade a sovereign government like that of Iraq and thus participate in enforcing the resolutions of the United Nations. The British government was in this case very biased as it even chose the resolutions to enforce and which ones to leave out, which by any standards cannot be viewed as respecting international rule of law (Allawi, 2007). The British government argued that it was not important to wait the United Nations to pass resolutions that would explicitly authorize the use of force in Iraq as this could mean taking a back seat and watch as a humanitarian crisis takes center stage in Iraq as it happened in Kosovo. By basing their argument on the Kosovo humanitarian catastrophe the British government justified the removal by force of the Iraq's undemocratic regime, arguing that the Iraq government was actually violating human rights of its citizens (Beck, Grande, & Cronin, 2007). The second question evolves around Britain's consistency on its quest to support human rights and democracy in foreign countries. When the human rights and democracy are used as base of justifying morality of a government's policies then consistency is considered to be a vital factor. Such arguments when applied selectively loose meaning and the weight they ought to carry. Although, largely believed that the more powerful and democratic countries can support human rights and democracy on foreign countries, they cannot achieve their objectives by use of force, since that would in fact, mean violation of the same human rights

BTN2-10 Coursework Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 250 words - 1

BTN2-10 - Coursework Example The ratio reveals the dependency level of a firm on loan to runs its operation (Rodgers, 23). The formula for this ratio is (total debt/total asset) * 100. Low debt ratio is advisable that is 50%, and below because a high debt ratio turn away potential investors. There is a high chance of a firm to be declared bankrupt when the debt ratio is too high. Samsung, Apple, and Google had the following Debt ratio of 32.9%, 32.9%, and 23.5% respectively. Apple and Samsung have an equal debt ratio of 32.9% in this comparison thus, tend to be risky. Analyzing ROA for Samsung and Apple, Samsung has the lowest; therefore it can be considered the riskiest firm to invest. The recommended maximum level of debt ratio is 50% and all the three firms operate below it. For one to be successful in stock market like Warren Buffet, critical analysis need to be conducted on the financial performance of the interested company. One needs to consider profitability and risk level of the interested firms. In this case, Apple and Google can be considered on the basis of high profitability level of Apple, while Google low risk level. It should be noted that an investor will look for a high return from the investment. According to (Elton, & Gruber, 41), the higher the return, the riskier the investment, and, therefore, sound decisions need to be done. Comparing the risk versus return of the two firms one can make a sound decision on which firm to invest. For Apple return versus risk is (32.9/28.5=1.2), while for Google is (23.5/12.9=1.8). Apple has the lowest ratio, thus it is the best firm to invest in and get better